|
kenton
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2009, 12:50:47 PM » |
|
On August 30, 2005, EPIC filed a petition with the Commission asking the Commission to investigate telecommunications carriers’ current security practices and to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to consider establishing more stringent security standards for telecommunications carriers to govern the disclosure of CPNI (Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information).
In particular, EPIC proposed that the Commission consider requiring the use of consumer-set passwords, creating audit trails, employing encryption, limiting data retention, and improving notice procedures.
On February 14, 2006, the Commission released the EPIC CPNI Notice, in which it sought comment on (a) the nature and scope of the problem identified by EPIC, including pretexting, and (b) what additional steps, if any, the Commission should take to protect further the privacy of CPNI.
Specifically, the Commission sought comment on the five EPIC proposals listed above. In addition, the Commission tentatively concluded that it should amend its rules to require carriers annually to file their section 64.2009(e) certifications with the Commission.
It also sought comment on whether it should require carriers to obtain a customer’s opt-in consent before the carrier shares CPNI with its joint venture partners and independent contractors; whether to impose rules relating to how carriers verify customers’ identities; whether to adopt a set of security requirements that could be used as the basis for liability if a carrier failed to implement such requirements, or adopt a set of security requirements that a carrier could implement to exempt itself from liability; whether VoIP service providers or other IP-enabled service providers should be covered by any new rules the Commission adopts in the present rulemaking; and other specific proposals that might increase the protection of CPNI.
As a result the rules require carriers to:
(1) implement a system by which the status of a customer’s CPNI approval can be clearly established prior to the use of CPNI;
(2) train their personnel as to when they are and are not authorized to use CPNI (and establish an express disciplinary process);
(3) maintain a record of instances in which CPNI has been disclosed or provided to third parties, or where third parties have been allowed access to CPNI, and to maintain such records for at least one year;
(4) establish a supervisory review process for “outbound” marketing campaigns under which sales personnel must obtain supervisory approval of proposed “outbound” marketing requests for customer approval;
(5) certify annually regarding its compliance with the Commission’s CPNI requirements and to make this certification publicly available.
|